Volume 39, Number 3: Symposium 2002
Prologue
Articles
- John R. Thomas, Liberty and Property in the Patent Law, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 569 (2002).
- Toshiko Takenaka, Rethinking the United States First-to-Invent Principle from a Comparative Law Perspective: A Proposal to Restructure § 102 Novelty and Priority Provisions, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 621 (2002).
- Craig Allen Nard, Toward a Cautious Approach to Obeisance: The Role of Scholarship in Federal Circuit Patent Law Jurisprudence, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 667 (2002).
- Paul M. Janicke, “Maybe We Shouldn’t Arbitrate”: Some Aspects of the Risk/Benefit Calculus of Agreeing to Binding Arbitration of Patent Disputes, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 693 (2002).
- Mark D. Janis & Jay P. Kesan, U.S. Plant Variety Protection: Sound and Fury . . . ?, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 727 (2002).
Essay
Notes
- Joan E. Beckner, Patent Infringement by Component Export: Waymark Corp. v. Porta Systems Corp. and the Extraterritorial Effect of U.S. Patent Law, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 803 (2002).
- Kristina G. Van Arsdel, Burdine v. Johnson: The Fifth Circuit Wakes Up, but the Supreme Court Refuses to Put the Sleeping Attorney Standard to Rest, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 835 (2002).
Posted on August 1, 2002
Filed Under Houston Law Review Issues | Leave a Comment
Comments
Leave a Reply
-
Search
-
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Subscribe to Houston Law Review in an RSS Reader -
Subscribe by E-mail
-
Alumni
-
Join the Houston Law Review LinkedIn Network
-