• Menu 
    • HLR Issues
      • 55.2: Symposium 2017
      • 55.1: Fall 2017
      • 54:5: Spring 2017
      • 54:4 – Frankel Lecture 2016
      • 54:3 – Winter 2017
      • 54:2 – Symposium 2016
      • 54:1 – Fall 2016
      • 53:5 – Spring 2016
      • 53:4 – Frankel Lecture 2015
      • 53:3 – Winter 2016
      • 53:2 – Symposium 2015
      • 53:1 – Fall 2015
      • 52:5 – Spring 2015
      • 52:4 – Frankel Lecture 2014
      • 52:3 – Winter 2015
      • 52:2 – Symposium 2014
      • 52:1 – Fall 2014
      • 51:5 – Federal Sentencing 2014
      • 51:4 – Frankel Lecture 2013
      • 51:3 – Winter 2014
      • 51:2 – Symposium 2013
      • 51:1 – Fall 2013
      • 50:5 – Spring 2013
      • 50:4 – Frankel Lecture 2012
      • 50:3 – Winter 2012
      • 50:2 – Symposium 2012
      • 50:1 – Fall 2012
      • 49:2 – Spring 2012
      • 49:1 – Frankel Lecture 2011
      • 48:5 – Winter 2012
      • 48:4 – Symposium 2011
      • 48:3 – Fall 2011
      • 48:2 – Spring 2011
      • 48:1 – Frankel Lecture 2010
      • 47:5 – Winter 2011
      • 47:4 – Symposium 2010
      • 47:3 – Fall 2010
      • 47:2 – Spring 2010
      • 47:1 – Frankel Lecture 2009
      • 46:5 – Spring 2010
      • 46:4 – Symposium 2009
      • 46:3 – Fall 2009
      • 46:2 – Summer 2009
      • 46:1 – Frankel Lecture 2008
    • HLRe: Off the Record
      • About HLRe: Off the Record
      • HLRe Issues
      • HLRe Submissions
    • Submissions
      • Submissions Procedures
      • Expedited Submissions
    • Subscriptions
    • About the Law Review
      • Mission Statement
      • Mastheads
      • Membership
      • Write-On Competition
      • Awards
      • Author Praise
      • Board of Directors
      • Board Minutes and Reports
      • Make A Donation
    • Contact Us
    • Alumni Services
      • Alumni Directory
      • Summer Improvement Fund
      • Alumni Newsletter
      • Book Binding
    • Events
      • The Frankel Lecture
      • IPIL Symposium
      • Community Volunteer Day

    Volume 39, Number 5: Spring 2003

    Articles

    • John V. Jacobi, Federal Power, Segregation, and Mental Disability, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 1231 (2003).
    • Carol Rice Andrews, After BE & K: The “Difficult Constitutional Question” of Defining the First Amendment Right To Petition Courts, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 1299 (2003).
    • Linda L. Berger, Shielding the Unmedia: Using the Process of Journalism to Protect the Journalist’s Privilege in an Infinite Universe of Publication, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 1371 (2003).
    • Bradford C. Mank, Suing Under § 1983: The Future After Gonzaga University v. Doe, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 1417 (2003).

    Comments

    • Tracey B. Cobb, Making a Killing: Evaluating the Constitutionality of the Texas Son of Sam Law, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 1483 (2003).
    • Stephanie Forbes, “Why Just Have One?”: An Evaluation of the Anti-Polygamy Laws Under the Establishment Clause, 39 Hous. L. Rev. 1517 (2003).

    Note

    • Fazila Issa, To Dispose or Not To Dispose: Questioning the Fate of Preembryos After a Divorce in J.B. v. M.B., 39 Hous. L. Rev. 1549 (2003).
    Copyright © Houston Law Review, Houston Law Foundation | Houston Law Review Member Console